Arce v. Ensign Group, Inc. underscores the importance of PAGA compliance for California employers and employees, emphasizing the need for accurate wage statements, prompt reporting of labor violations, and the significance of evidence in summary judgment proceedings.
California recently enacted SB 699 and AB 1076, laws that expand the state's prohibition on most non-compete agreements . These laws prohibit employers from including non-compete clauses in employment contracts and mandate notifying current and certain former employees hired after January 2022 about the invalidity of any such clauses, with new penalties in place for violations.
SB 497, the Equal Pay and Anti-Retaliation Protection Act, amends Labor Code sections to create a rebuttable presumption of retaliation when employees are disciplined or terminated within 90 days of protected activity, simplifying the process of proving retaliation.
Recent Supreme Court decision in Groff v. DeJoy has brought renewed attention to the obligations employers face when dealing with religious accommodations, increasing the burden on employers to show they will be substantially affected by an employee's request.
A new California law makes it easier for employees to establish retaliation claims against their employers by creating a rebuttable presumption of retaliation if an employer takes an adverse action against an employee within 90 days of that employee engaging in a protected activity.
California's ongoing legal battle with Uber and Lyft highlights worker classification, consumer protection, and arbitration agreements, emphasizing the state's authority to pursue legal action despite existing arbitration agreements with drivers.
With Governor Newsom's approval of SB 235, California's discovery process undergoes substantial streamlining. This bill revises the California Code of Civil Procedure (2016.090) to align more closely with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, aiming to simplify legal discovery for employers and employees.
Explore the implications for employers of SB 525, which introduces a significant minimum wage increase to $25 an hour for healthcare workers in California.
Arce v. Southland Care Center underscores the importance for employers to uphold California labor laws on meal and rest breaks.
Learn about the crucial components of California's new Workplace Violence Prevention Plan (WVPP) and how to ensure your workplace meets the requirements.
Discover the impact SB 848: California's new reproductive loss leave law. Explore the implications and challenges this law presents, and how it may affect your workplace. Dive into the details of this crucial legislation, ensuring you're prepared for the changes ahead.
In this post, we delve into the essentials of California's sick leave laws, breaking down eligibility, accrual, exceptions, and the responsibilities of both employers and employees.
This past Tuesday, Gavin Newsom signed into law SB 365, a California bill which allows cases to continue in court even if a defendant appeals a denial of arbitration. Proponents argue it protects workers and consumers, while critics worry it may harm job prospects and could conflict with federal arbitration law.
California's recent expansion of paid sick leave benefits to guarantee five days per year, up from three, under SB 616 has ignited concerns among small businesses already facing financial challenges.
In Harstein v. Hyatt Corp., the Ninth Circuit clarifies that temporary layoffs without definite return dates trigger immediate payment of accrued vacation pay.
California employers should be aware of recent Court of Appeal decision LaCour v. Marshalls of California, LLC, et. al., as they may now face further PAGA litigation, despite a prior settlement of a previous PAGA claim.
Recently, the California Court of Appeal has upheld Proposition 22, maintaining the independent contractor status for ride-share drivers. However, the potential appeal to the California Supreme Court leaves their classification uncertain.
Can PAGA claims be entirely dismissed based on manageability concerns? California Court of Appeal currently divided; resolution pending from the California Supreme Court.
The California Supreme Court has affirmed that employees are entitled to protection under the state's whistleblower statute, regardless of whether the information they report is already known by their employer or a government agency.
Adolph v. Uber clarifies that employees compelled to arbitrate individual PAGA claims can still pursue non-individual claims, affirming their rights to enforce labor laws.
California courts have recognized "associational" disability discrimination, allowing employees to bring claims on behalf of others. Recent cases shed light on the complexities and employer obligations, emphasizing the importance of reasonable accommodations and the interactive process.
California Court of Appeal rules that PAGA plaintiff does not lose representative standing when individual PAGA claim is sent to arbitration.
Recent Court of Appeal opinion disagrees with 2022 ruling from different district on issue of PAGA issue preclusion.
Summary of new employment laws for California in 2023.
California Court of Appeal addresses whether a party can accept 998 offer after summary judgment hearing when motion is granted.
There is no charge for the initial phone consultation. Fill out the contact form on the website with detailed information about your circumstances and we will schedule a telephone appointment.
